Members Kerouac Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 Model: Suhr Pro Series T2 Finish Color: Vintage WhiteWeight: 7.65 lbsBody Wood: AlderNeck Wood: MapleNeck Shape: 60's "C" Vintage StandardFingerboard: MapleFingerboard Radius: Compound Radius (9"-12")Width at Nut: 1.650"Nut Material: TusqPickups: Chrome T (neck) and Classic T (bridge)Case: Original Suhr Gig Bag $1,649.00 (used) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members kayd_mon Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 It looks like your average Tele. Since I generally don't like the feel of Teles, I wouldn't expect this one to be any different. I like the look of the aged white finish, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Steadfastly Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 Nice looking tele. Nothing special. It would look better without that faded yellow look, though. Yuk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Rand-O-Monium Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 I'm sure it's wonderful,but Meh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members benricci Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 Just a plain ol' Tele. No big whoop... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bjcarl Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 holy {censored} that's expensive... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Kerouac Posted December 5, 2012 Author Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 Originally Posted by bjcarl holy {censored} that's expensive... Not really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BydoEmpire Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 Hell yes, except if I buy a Suhr it's gotta have stainless frets. I'm sure she plays and sounds amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Tidal Rhythm Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 As a huge Tele fan, I'd be all over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bjcarl Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 Originally Posted by Kerouac Not really. At that price, you truly are paying to have "Suhr" on the headstock... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Kerouac Posted December 5, 2012 Author Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 Originally Posted by bjcarl At that price, you truly are paying to have "Suhr" on the headstock... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Kerouac Posted December 5, 2012 Author Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 Originally Posted by bjcarl At that price, you truly are paying to have "Suhr" on the headstock... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bjcarl Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 Originally Posted by Kerouac First of all...I really dig your GPOTD thing and appreciate you posting them...some I think are amazing, some I think are meh, so it often boils down to personal taste(in other words, I'm not trying to troll). I also really dig tele's(I've yet to personally bond with one, but I have mad respect)...All of that said, in my opinion(and it's just an opinion...I'm guessing I'm in the minority), that's a lot to pay for what it is...I'm guessing you could achieve a similar result in terms of tone and feel with an upgraded base-line Fender. It is a beautiful looking Tele, however... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members poolshark Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 Suhr Teles are not for me. Beautiful instruments, super well made, but a little too 'clean' feeling. Not much personality, IME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members xrleroyx Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 I've never played a Suhr, but if I was looking to BUY a guitar and not plan on selling it later, it'd either be a Suhr or a Danocaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members photon9 Posted December 5, 2012 Members Share Posted December 5, 2012 I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Steadfastly Posted December 6, 2012 Members Share Posted December 6, 2012 Originally Posted by Kerouac Not really. It's overpriced for what you get but the shop calls it "custom" no doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members mistersully Posted December 6, 2012 Members Share Posted December 6, 2012 Originally Posted by xrleroyx I've never played a Suhr, but if I was looking to BUY a guitar and not plan on selling it later, it'd either be a Suhr or a Danocaster. why would that be the case if you've never played one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members GAS Man Posted December 6, 2012 Members Share Posted December 6, 2012 I know Suhr guitars are "da goods" and I'd love to own one. But dang, they've got fugly headstocks. There, I said it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Malcolm Ramone Posted December 6, 2012 Members Share Posted December 6, 2012 Originally Posted by GAS Man I know Suhr guitars are "da goods" and I'd love to own one. But dang, they've got fugly headstocks. There, I said it! Agreed. Looks like a $150 SX! Also don't like the flat spot where the jack is. Looks like a mistake. I'm sure it's high quality, just doesn't give the feeling of it. -Adam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members craigny Posted December 6, 2012 Members Share Posted December 6, 2012 really nice but not the Shur id go for if i was going to buy a Shur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Faber Posted December 6, 2012 Members Share Posted December 6, 2012 Looks nice. I'd certainly like to have it and the price isn't that unreasonable. Always thought the Suhr headstock looks a bit wrong on tele styles - it's so obviously designed with strat styles n mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Brian Krashpad Posted December 6, 2012 Members Share Posted December 6, 2012 It's a Tele. What's not to like. I understand the headstock thing, but I'm growing past that. A smidge pricey especially for an inveterate cheap bastid such as myself, but have seldom heard a cross word for Suhrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.