Members gt_jumper Posted December 30, 2011 Members Share Posted December 30, 2011 just bought one for $250au, gunna pick it up tomorrow. goof cleans? high gains?.....Brootz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members guitarbilly74 Posted December 30, 2011 Members Share Posted December 30, 2011 I'm a Randall fan but I dislike the RH series, pretty weak and thin sounding compare to say a RG100 or a Cyclone/Titan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members gt_jumper Posted December 31, 2011 Author Members Share Posted December 31, 2011 So its not gunna be a replacement for the classic 50 or the 6505 , i was gunna use it to hire as a back line amplifier (we're starting to do live gigs). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members gt_jumper Posted December 31, 2011 Author Members Share Posted December 31, 2011 I just tried it, i hope i never hear it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members tech21man Posted December 31, 2011 Members Share Posted December 31, 2011 so bad really? I liked the g3 series through a marshall cab. In fact I thought it sounded better than the TSL which was there at the time, clearer etc. I also liked better than the V2 which was compressed dark and muddy as hell compared...But the fact that the RH is clear, it means it can go indeed "thin" "rough" "edgy" without balls especially if one's guitar and playing style go towards to promote such sounds...It sounded really good with some guitars and really bad with others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members guitarbilly74 Posted December 31, 2011 Members Share Posted December 31, 2011 so bad really? I liked the g3 series through a marshall cab. In fact I thought it sounded better than the TSL which was there at the time, clearer etc. I also liked better than the V2 which was compressed dark and muddy as hell compared...But the fact that the RH is clear, it means it can go indeed "thin" "rough" "edgy" without balls especially if one's guitar and playing style go towards to promote such sounds...It sounded really good with some guitars and really bad with others. nah it just sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members timmyfirst Posted December 31, 2011 Members Share Posted December 31, 2011 horrible amps, its the only amp ive ever found that didnt sound good with an mxr dIII infront of. put it in the bin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members gt_jumper Posted January 1, 2012 Author Members Share Posted January 1, 2012 Sooo it says on the back of this cab 4 ohm minimum? 4ohm - 150watts 8 ohm - 100watts There is no switch or anything of the sort to change teh ohmage output. Can this amp run a single 16 ohm cab? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members gt_jumper Posted January 1, 2012 Author Members Share Posted January 1, 2012 horrible amps, its the only amp ive ever found that didnt sound good with an mxr dIII infront of. put it in the bin I sold it, for slightly more then i payed for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members gt_jumper Posted January 1, 2012 Author Members Share Posted January 1, 2012 Its clean channel was overly clean and with the built in reverb, not that bad. pedals would go sweet on this rig at a guess. But for the price i payed, this thing is a ticket onto stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.