If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
No but I've played through one, and I couldnt tell the difference. according to the rep at the time they switched designs said that only the difference besides layout of the eq was fixing some problems with the power section, supposedly the 200s were really unreliable.
alot of the Dimebag freaks will tell you the II doesnt sound anything like the original, but I've played them side by side and can tell you with all honestly, I think they sound exactly the same.
Id also like to play it side by side with a RG100ES...
Im in .... Love my randall to death.. Has a killer tone and loads of power..My amp has only had 1 owner(me) and its like 17 years old.....The amp was made for a guitar with EMG's imho.. Because the tone is crushing and thick
<div class="signaturecontainer"><i><font size="4">**************** what you heard.. Real Pimpin going on</font><br />
ORIGINAL: Steveski<br />
questionable and hedonistic
</div> Brandenburg, I think we've found your epitaph. [<img src="http://img3.harmony-central.com/acapella/ubb/wink.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Wink" class="inlineimg" />]
</div> My ethics arnt for sale but they can be rented from time to time. LOL<br />
<b>Guitar Rig:</b><br />
'89 Randall RG 100 ES w/ custom footswitch<br />
Peavey 4X12 <br />
'01 MII Jackson Dinky DK-2 Modded<br />
w/ 79' Gibson T-Top,volume bypass,multi-cap, and kill switch mod<br />
<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font size="6">REVELUTION</font></font><br />
<font face="Comic Sans MS"><font size="4">Neil</font></font></div>