Will it be redundant to get this amp?

[IrvOnly]

Hi All,

 

     I have got a chance to trade my Randall RH 100 G2 head plus cash on my end (500$) for a Peavey 6505 Head (non plus). 

 

    I do believe it's a better amp than the randall but I am unsure on making the trade because of the amps I already have. ( Modded Peavey VTM 60 and Engl E530) 

 

Do you think It will be a good thing to get it or will it be "Redundant" to the amps I already have? I never really had the chance to play around with this amp but heard many many good things about it.

 

Could you also mention famous people/records/bands using it? 

 

Any input on this will be appreciated. 

 

Thanks !! 

 

[Stonedtone]

---

IrvOnly wrote:

 

Hi All,

 

 

 

     I have got a chance to trade my Randall RH 100 G2 head plus cash on my end (500$) for a Peavey 6505 Head (non plus). 

 

 

 

    I do believe it's a better amp than the randall but I am unsure on making the trade because of the amps I already have. ( Modded Peavey VTM 60 and Engl E530) 

 

 

 

Do you think It will be a good thing to get it or will it be "Redundant" to the amps I already have? I never really had the chance to play around with this amp but heard many many good things about it.

 

 

 

Could you also mention famous people/records/bands using it? 

 

 

 

Any input on this will be appreciated. 

 

 

 

Thanks !! 

 

 

---

 

Could you also mention famous people/records/bands using it?

Why would that matter to you?

[IrvOnly]

only as reference.... will probably listen to their music and see if that's what I am looking for.... not that I want to have the same amp EVH has for example.... that I dont give a ... about haha 

[Ultraworld]

From a price/value standpoint the Peavey is worth more. But the Randall SS amps have a huge fanbase. I've never heard a SS amp with so much bottom end. But you make a good point. You should try them both side by side and see what you think. It's not going to sound like your VTM (a personal favorite) or your Engl.