Did anyone even read the articles?
It states that the cooling is the result of decreased solar activity for the past year. If next year were to have a return to previous levels of activity, then we're back to exactly where we started. The article is discussing an aspect of climate that is independent of green house gas emissions and their effect on the global temperatures.
If you decrease the fire fueling an oven, it gets cooler. It doesn't change the fact that it's still an oven and is still good at trapping heat. It just means that there is less heat to be trapped.
Anyone who cites this article as "proof" against global warming has no grasp on any of the concepts involved in either global warming or the article.
wait, you want me to READ the article? my mind is made up. i don't need to read and have my mind made up for me.