Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Clinton emails released

Collapse
X
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by goodhonk View Post

    You live in jerk world
    Why would you say that, when Kenneth Star spent millions of taxpayer's dollars any years investigating Hillary & Bill Clinton, there were 8 Benghazi investigations, and the FBI thoroughly investigated Hillary Clinton's use of an private email server, and yet there has never been a verified shred of evidence that she has ever broken the law.

    Trump on the other hand, has been successfully sued by wrongfully evicted tenants, unpaid workers and contractors, the Federal government for refusing to rent to Blacks, and by students of his fraudulent Trump University, so it would appear that the investigation of him while holding the most powerful and influential positions on Earth would be more likely than that of a former government employee who never been found guilty or liable in any court action.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by y0gibayer View Post
      1,800 new emails from Hillary Clinton that were not handed over to Congress that show clear evidence of pay to play and mishandling of classified info.
      Ms. Clinton lost the election.

      Donald Trump is in the White House, at least when he bothers showing up for work.

      Why is any of this ''information'' important. Assuming of course that any of it is real.
      __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ______________
      How Come Other People Can Get Away With Jokes Like That?

      Face it Tea Bagging Neo-Cons...if Reagan ran today, you'd be calling him a RINO socialist! -- scott666

      Barack Obama must be kenyan - everytime he speaks they trot a translator out the next day to explain what he said.-- ToBeAnnounced

      And even then some people still don't understand.-- RogueGnome

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BadDaddy View Post
        Originally posted by goodhonk
        You live in jerk world
        Why would you say that, when Kenneth Star spent millions of taxpayer's dollars any years investigating Hillary & Bill Clinton, there were 8 Benghazi investigations, and the FBI thoroughly investigated Hillary Clinton's use of an private email server, and yet there has never been a verified shred of evidence that she has ever broken the law.

        Trump on the other hand, has been successfully sued by wrongfully evicted tenants, unpaid workers and contractors, the Federal government for refusing to rent to Blacks, and by students of his fraudulent Trump University, so it would appear that the investigation of him while holding the most powerful and influential positions on Earth would be more likely than that of a former government employee who never been found guilty or liable in any court action.
        Isn't it odd how some people miss all that? I wonder why?
        __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ______________
        How Come Other People Can Get Away With Jokes Like That?

        Face it Tea Bagging Neo-Cons...if Reagan ran today, you'd be calling him a RINO socialist! -- scott666

        Barack Obama must be kenyan - everytime he speaks they trot a translator out the next day to explain what he said.-- ToBeAnnounced

        And even then some people still don't understand.-- RogueGnome

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by The Badger View Post
          Ms. Clinton lost the election.

          Donald Trump is in the White House, at least when he bothers showing up for work.

          Why is any of this ''information'' important. Assuming of course that any of it is real.
          It is important because it is potentially evidence of federal crimes. It may not be politically meaningful anymore as a result of the election, but that doesn't make it completely unimportant.

          If there was evidence released that the former (retired) CFO of GE might have engaged in fraudulent accounting acts, would you be so quick to toss it aside? Would the fact that he is retired and no longer involved in the business matter? Methinks you are applying a rather politically expedient double standard.

          That said, given the source, there is little reason to believe that a new "smoking gun" present...but I could be wrong.
          "The historical experience of socialist countries has sadly demonstrated that collectivism does not do away with alienation but rather increases it, adding to it a lack of basic necessities and economic inefficiency." ------------------ Pope John Paul II

          Comment


          • The Badger
            The Badger commented
            Editing a comment
            I'm going to let the courts sort it all out.

        • #35
          Originally posted by BadDaddy View Post

          Why would you say that, when Kenneth Star spent millions of taxpayer's dollars any years investigating Hillary & Bill Clinton, there were 8 Benghazi investigations, and the FBI thoroughly investigated Hillary Clinton's use of an private email server, and yet there has never been a verified shred of evidence that she has ever broken the law.

          Trump on the other hand, has been successfully sued by wrongfully evicted tenants, unpaid workers and contractors, the Federal government for refusing to rent to Blacks, and by students of his fraudulent Trump University, so it would appear that the investigation of him while holding the most powerful and influential positions on Earth would be more likely than that of a former government employee who never been found guilty or liable in any court action.

          Fonz is a big Apprentice fan. TV personalities excite him.
          __________________________________________________
          Politics are like sports, where both teams suck

          Maybe we can all just agree that Bush was stupid and Cheney was lying and call it a day. - guitarcapo

          Originally posted by Grumpy_Polecat View Post
          For the record: Hitler using gas to exterminate his presumed enemies does not equal the use of chemical weapons.
          Reprehensible as it was, gassing was a conventional and accepted method for execution at the time. It is a stretch to equivocate the two.

          Comment


          • #36
            Clinton sent me an email on Friday. He sent me the PowerPoint I wanted.

            Comment


            • The Badger
              The Badger commented
              Editing a comment
              I shudder to think of what was in that PowerPoint file. It could put Anthony Weiner to shame. (Again.)

            • oldsoapbars
              oldsoapbars commented
              Editing a comment
              His name is Andrew Clinton. He's a structures engineer. It was a make/buy assumptions report

          • #37
            Originally posted by SteinbergerHack View Post
            Intersting that this link was provided by a brand-new forum member who hasn't posted any responses in the thread.........hmmmm.........
            A 'brand-new' forum member who joined in 2013 and wrote four of their seven posts in this thread. .... Coupd it be that members are f the banned have stand-ins forcwhen they're sick? Or maybe Yogi was just so angered by word of new Clinton emails that he/she came here to vent??..... Ahh, local politics.
            My band!:
            www.steelphantoms.com/
            my stage stuff:
            fender jimmie vaughan strat, korg dt-10, ts-9, keeley rat, thoroughly modded big muff, 4ms tremulus lune, eventide timefactor running stereo to a traynor bassmaster (w hotplate) and a fender HRD. Everything ('cept the TimeFactor and dt-10) is modded, with much help from folks at Harmony Central. Thanks everybody!

            Comment


            • #38
              Originally posted by arcadesonfire View Post

              A 'brand-new' forum member who joined in 2013 and wrote four of their seven posts in this thread. .... Coupd it be that members are f the banned have stand-ins forcwhen they're sick? Or maybe Yogi was just so angered by word of new Clinton emails that he/she came here to vent??..... Ahh, local politics.
              I don't have much time to post. I'm certainly not an alt for someone else. I read through the posts once a month or so. I just noticed this one hadn't been discussed and thought we should.

              Comment


              • Tom Hicks
                Tom Hicks commented
                Editing a comment
                The topic certainly roused you from your years-long apathy. However since an FBI investigation that lasted more than a year as well as multiple Congressional investigations were unable to come up with anything culpable, I just wonder why you're interested in this topic. And why now? And especially since you've been a member for years and as you say check the Forum once a month or so, why did you fail to comment on any of the mini Clinton email threads over the last few years?

                Even you can see that this looks really suspicious. Unless you're completely unfamiliar with the concept of sock puppet alt accounts.

            • #39
              Originally posted by harrycox1 View Post
              Judicial Watch is untrustworthy for factual reporting.



              https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/judicial-watch/

              http://freedomoutpost.com/mediabiasf...t-telling-you/

              https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs...st-republicans

              Comment


              • #40
                "Freedom outpost"?
                ______________

                Comment


                • Tom Hicks
                  Tom Hicks commented
                  Editing a comment
                  Some people get upset when you fact-check them. Their Credo - what do you mean saying my opinions aren't as credible as your facts?

              • #41
                Originally posted by y0gibayer View Post
                Remember that the state department is slow walking the remainder of Hillary's emails to us and we won't see them until 2020. There is absolutely no reason for this
                You've been asked for a link to back up your factual claim that the State Department is "slow walking" the release of the remainder of Hillary's emails. As per the forum rules, you can either provide a substantiating link, retract the claim of fact, or restate it as your personal opinion.

                Ignoring the request is not an option.

                Please select one of the options and reply.

                Thanks.
                **********

                "Look at it this way: think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of 'em are stupider than that."

                - George Carlin

                "It shouldn't be expected that people are necessarily doing what they appear to be doing on records."

                - Sir George Martin, All You Need Is Ears

                "The music business will be revitalized by musicians, not the labels or Live Nation. When the musicians decide to put music first, instead of money, the public will flock to the fruits and the scene will be healthy again."

                - Bob Lefsetz, The Lefsetz Letter

                Comment


                • #42
                  Originally posted by Grumpy_Polecat View Post
                  The part about her wearing green when everyone else was wearing white is amusing.
                  It was her turn to wear green.


                  Current global warming temperature trend: 0.05ºC per decade, plus or minus 0.1ºC (source: UN IPCC AR5) ...Yes, the error rate is higher than the estimated rate of change.

                  "Anthropogenic global warming is a proposed theory whose basic mechanism is well understood, but whose magnitude is highly uncertain. The growing evidence that climate models are too sensitive to CO2 has implications for the attribution of late-20th-century warming and projections of 21st-century climate. If the recent warming hiatus is caused by natural variability, then this raises the question as to what extent the warming between 1975 and 2000 can also be explained by natural climate variability." --Dr. Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology

                  Comment


                • #43
                  Originally posted by Gromit
                  Joined in 2013 and never posted anything until 2016, then this. It's certainly an unusual way to behave.
                  Russian sleeper cell.

                  Current global warming temperature trend: 0.05ºC per decade, plus or minus 0.1ºC (source: UN IPCC AR5) ...Yes, the error rate is higher than the estimated rate of change.

                  "Anthropogenic global warming is a proposed theory whose basic mechanism is well understood, but whose magnitude is highly uncertain. The growing evidence that climate models are too sensitive to CO2 has implications for the attribution of late-20th-century warming and projections of 21st-century climate. If the recent warming hiatus is caused by natural variability, then this raises the question as to what extent the warming between 1975 and 2000 can also be explained by natural climate variability." --Dr. Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology

                  Comment


                  • #44
                    Hillary-obsessed Trump supporters turn to Hillary when defending their boy becomes tedious and tiresome.
                    To you I'm an atheist; but to God, I'm the Loyal Opposition.

                    Comment


                    • #45
                      Originally posted by E-money View Post


                      Fonz is a big Apprentice fan. TV personalities excite him.
                      Yeah, well you like soap operas and your breath stinks.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X