Harmony Central Forums
Announcement Announcement Module
Collapse
No announcement yet.

Judge Who Ruled Against Recess Appointments Is A Wingnut

Page Title Module
Move Remove Collapse









X
Conversation Detail Module
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Judge Who Ruled Against Recess Appointments Is A Wingnut

    Just thought I'd point out the long-time wingnuttery and judicial activism of D.C. District Judge David Sentelle, the Reagan-appointee circuit judge and Jesse Helms protegee -- the man who appointed Kenneth Starr -- who just invalidated Obama's NLRB appointments, thus kicking off a whole potential mess o'legal chaos!

    The D.C. district is second only to the Supreme Court in its importance, and of course it has three (soon to be four) vacancies, which Republicans refuse to allow Obama to fill. Gee, real filibuster reform would have been nice, wouldn't it?

    This Daily Kos postfrom 2010 sums it up pretty well:

     

    Back to Sentelle, the lead judge of this circuit court, and a reminder that this is someone who, when he gets a chance, puts his right wing, authoritarian political beliefs over and above the principle of justice. Is it any wonder that the reason he became a judge is that he was appointed by Ronald Reagan, a man who also whenever he got a chance,  also put his own right wing, authoritarian political beliefs over and above the principle of justice.

    This is, for example, the same partisan hack who voted to overturn the convictions of Oliver North and John Poindexter, for their Iran Contra crimes.

    This is, for example, the same partisan hack who appointed his fellow partisan hack Kenneth Starr for his witchhunt of the Clintons.

    This is, for example, the same partisan hack who enthusiastically supported the "Military Commissions Act" and its destruction of habeas corpus for enemy combatants; if you are David Sentelle and the government accuses you of a crime, you are guilty until you can prove innocence, rather than the other way around, and the government can throw up all sorts of roadblocks to prove your innocence. Unless, of course, you are someone like Ollie North. Then, of course, your innocence is fully presumed.

    The man has no business wearing a judge's robe, and is a disgrace to our supposed rule of law

     

    http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/judge-who-ruled-against-recess-appoin

    Free ******************** Riot!.

  • #2
    And the repugs hate judicial activism. Frauds.

    Comment


    • Hoddy
      Hoddy commented
      Editing a comment

      TheNord wrote:
      And the repugs hate judicial activism. Frauds.

      How is the Judge's ruling judicial activism?



Working...
X