Jump to content

basic question, the highs & lows


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I've got a Mackie srm450 and it has 100 Watts for the highs (the horn) and 300 Watts for the lows (the 12"). Apparantly the total watts is 400 but the way I see things if the highs is only 100 Watts then isn't that a limiting factor? I know I'm wrong on this I just don't know why. I think bass is softer so it requires more watts to keep up w/ higher frequencies. But I don't c how u can add the highs and lows together since they are different. So if the highs were 50 watts and the lows 1000 watts would that cause a balance problem? I'm totally confused and would appreciate any help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Originally posted by semi_divine

I've got a Mackie srm450 and it has 100 Watts for the highs (the horn) and 300 Watts for the lows (the 12"). Apparantly the total watts is 400 but the way I see things if the highs is only 100 Watts then isn't that a limiting factor? I know I'm wrong on this I just don't know why. I think bass is softer so it requires more watts to keep up w/ higher frequencies. But I don't c how u can add the highs and lows together since they are different. So if the highs were 50 watts and the lows 1000 watts would that cause a balance problem? I'm totally confused and would appreciate any help.

Its pretty basic. The lower the frequency,the more power it takes to reproduce it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The horn is also quite a bit more efficient than the cone driver. It doesn't need as much power to generate the same SPL.

 

In fact, that 300/100 ratio seems pretty low. The average decent quality horn has a sensitivity upwards of 107dB. An average sub is what, 97? 98? That's a power factor of ten. I'd think it would be better balanced if the ratio was on the order of 1000/100.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...