Jump to content

Anybody use outboard mic pre's for live sound?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

unusual if the mixer already has pre's. not unsual for lightpipe interface mixers.

 

i think you might find us tech people want pre's that change a mic signal into a signal the mixer can use and not much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've had singers hand me one of those behringer mic pres and request I patch that in with their vocal channel... they tell me the tube pre really warms up the sound...

 

I plug it in and sit it there, but the mic isn't running through it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I once used one to sit on because the stool was too low to see over the console.

 

Any reasonable board will have mic preamps that are plenty-good for any live application that the board itself is good for. But, mic pre's are a feel-good profit center for those who don't have confidence in their own ability to just get the job done and focus on the mix. They are also responsible for a lot of ad revenue to the magazines that review their "wonderful" sound and how they really are responsible for making a mix come together. If the ad is well done, there are plenty of guppies that will take the bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've never used them, nor have I seen them used by others in the pro audio sphere. Granted I don't have the experience that others do on this forum, but even at my level I don't see the need. It seems like just an extraneous piece of gear and one more thing to complicate one's setup.

 

We did, however, use them when I was in broadcast radio, but that was just to match up the mics with the board the station was using. Of course this is really apples and oranges, since broadcast mixers and pro sound mixers are two different animals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do believe that was the case, as we got new digital boards all around in both production studios and in each broadcast studio (we had an FM and an AM station in the same building). Microphones were Shure SM7s, although we did have an EV RE20 that was my favorite.

 

Before the new boards, our FM studio had an old console with a manufacture date of 1967. Our tech absolutely hated the thing, and was constantly jury-rigging it to keep it limping along. It had these huge potentiometers on the face of the unit, and when you turned it all the way counterclockwise it clicked "off" and then routed the signal to the cue speaker.

 

This picture is about as close as I can find to the one we had when I started, only ours was in way worse condition and had fewer "features."

 

IC-10A.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There were a lot of hack techs working in the radio field and when they tried to fix the equipment in-house or worse yet modify it, the results became the new weak link. Bailing wire and bubble gum seemed to be standard fixes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We had a good tech (he was contracted to a couple other radio stations as well as a few local TV stations, and was helping them get their HDTV broadcasting equipment up and running at the time), although who knows what modifications had been done to that console before he came on board. I know there was a newscaster at the station who fancied himself a Mr. Fix-it when it came to electronics, and a lot of his "repairs" were well-known around the station. When I asked the tech what was wrong with the board, he just shook his head and smiled.

 

I guess that's the life of radio consoles. They are in use 24/7, all year round, and are often serviced while still in operation. Our tech had trouble sourcing parts for repair when stuff would break, and if he did find a part, it was almost as old as the one that needed to be replaced. He also had issues matching the outputs of our newer CD players and our computer (our FM station was automated) to the console's inputs, so there were little preamp boxes inside the console. They were still outboard gear, but there's so much room inside those things you could probably have a cat live in there. Just like the one in the picture, the faceplate was hinged at the bottom and the entire thing would lift forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If i had some speakers good enough to notice the difference then I'd have some outboard pre's.

 

Ps. Special J - Avalon737 - really? I don't like em in the studio. Very very very clean and detailed but totally sterile!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • CMS Author

 

I was just wondering if this is done and for what applications. Voice, instrument micing?

 

 

It is done by those who've drunk the marketing Kool-Aid that tells them they can get better sound by running a mic into an outboard preamp, which is then run into the same preamp in their live mixing console. Those people are easily identified by the excessive use of adjectives like "open", "warm", "British", when describing sound......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I've had singers hand me one of those behringer mic pres and request I patch that in with their vocal channel... they tell me the tube pre really warms up the sound...


I plug it in and sit it there, but the mic isn't running through it.

 

 

I had the same thing happen. I tried to use it but the sound REALLY sucked badly (all mids and harsh - nothing warm about it). I was acting as their FOH engineer at the time so once they were all on stage, I quickly removed it from the chain and everyone was happy.

 

I have patched in various other units I.E. Joe meek, Avalon...... It wasn't any problem but I thought in the end it made very little difference (No where near the difference the B unit made!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In general if you think you need better pre's for live sound you should really find out what you're doing wrong. Some boards you can get away with flashing the peak lights but some you can't. If it sounds harsh try reducing your channel pre-gains. In the bad old days we had to run them as hot as possible to keep down the noise but these days you can usually run them just tickling the yellows when PFL'd and you might just be surprised how much better those pre's sound :cool:.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They are a tool, just like anything else. You shouldn't need one for your everyday gigs as your mixer should provide an adequate interface for your mics.

 

If you are making a recording of the performance, AND, you are using microphones that are usually found in a studio, there can be a need to use a outboard mic preamp. For example, I have a Neuman TLM103 that requires a lot of gain before it sounds good. Going into either a Mackie or Yamaha board direct doesn't cut it. But if I put a RNP (which has 66 db of gain available, more than most live board channels) in line, the mic comes alive. If a live sound board had enough gain, the RNP would not be required.

 

So, it is a tool, usually not needed, and certainly not required for most live performance mics.

 

Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

They are a tool, just like anything else. You shouldn't need one for your everyday gigs as your mixer should provide an adequate interface for your mics.


If you are making a recording of the performance, AND, you are using microphones that are usually found in a studio, there can be a need to use a outboard mic preamp. For example, I have a Neuman TLM103 that requires a lot of gain before it sounds good. Going into either a Mackie or Yamaha board direct doesn't cut it. But if I put a RNP (which has 66 db of gain available, more than most live board channels) in line, the mic comes alive. If a live sound board had enough gain, the RNP would not be required.


So, it is a tool, usually not needed, and certainly not required for most live performance mics.


Rick

 

 

That's a bit surprising to me, because my experience with that mic is that it is really friggin' hot. Definitely much more so than any of the common ones I generally would use for live sound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

That's a bit surprising to me, because my experience with that mic is that it is really friggin' hot. Definitely much more so than any of the common ones I generally would use for live sound.

 

 

Not mine. Maybe there is something wrong with it. It is definatly not as hot as my KSM44. Are you sure. If others agree, I will have to have it checked out.

 

Rick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Not mine. Maybe there is something wrong with it. It is definatly not as hot as my KSM44. Are you sure. If others agree, I will have to have it checked out.


Rick

 

 

Well, see, now I guess there's a distinction to be drawn. I would consider a KSM44 to be a lot hotter than any of the mics I typically pull out for live sound, as well. I would guess they are in the same ballpark,though.

 

I can say I've yet to run into a common mic that I can't drive well into clip at what I consider a reasonable SNR on any modern console. I mean, that is, unless what I am attempting to amplify is a pin dropping or something similar to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not mine. Maybe there is something wrong with it. It is definatly not as hot as my KSM44. Are you sure. If others agree, I will have to have it checked out.


Rick

 

That sounds like there is a problem with your mic. The Neumann claims the TLM 103 outputs 23 mV/Pa @ 1kHz. Shure claims the KSM44 produces 28 mV/Pa (-31dBV/Pa). These are too similar to need the gain your mic needs. Heck, if you can get enough gain out of an SM58 (1.85mV/Pa or -54.5dBV/Pa), then your 103 must be producing less than that, which puts it solidly in the "in need of repair" category. Sorry :mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That sounds like there is a problem with your mic. The Neumann claims the TLM 103 outputs 23 mV/Pa @ 1kHz. Shure claims the KSM44 produces 28 mV/Pa (-31dBV/Pa). These are too similar to need the gain your mic needs. Heck, if you can get enough gain out of an SM58 (1.85mV/Pa or -54.5dBV/Pa), then your 103 must be producing less than that, which puts it solidly in the "in need of repair" category. Sorry
:mad:

 

That would definitely fall much more in line with what I would expect from my seat-of-the-pants, knob-twiddling experiences with those mics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...