Members Yer Blues Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 I recently pulled out my recording unit. In the past I recorded guitars and vocals with a SM 57 because it was the only mic I had. I recently acquired a SM 58 to go with my PA additions. I did some recording with it and noticed the vocals were not as hot as in the past with the SM 57. I believe the standard is the 57 for micing guitars and 58 for vocals, but does anyone else use a SM 57 for vocals? I know it really doesn't matter, I'm just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Caspar Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 Lemmy of Mot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members soul-x Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 Sure, lots of folks. And for recording purposes, I generally prefer the 57 to the 58 on vocals, provided a pop filter is in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members soul-x Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 Lemmy of Mot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Yer Blues Posted September 8, 2010 Author Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 Thanks... I was unaware. My vocal range is "limited". Now, I just need to remember where I put the 57! I was excited to try out the 58, but surprised when the older recordings I did with the 57 sounded better IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMS Author Craig Vecchione Posted September 8, 2010 CMS Author Share Posted September 8, 2010 Always keep in mind that mics will vary in output among the same model. Differences in manufacturing, age, and possible abuse/accident can affect the tone and output of a dynamic mic. You could have a hot -57 and a weak -58. Another pair of 57 and 58 could be completely different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members agedhorse Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 With a 57, you can also get closer to the diaphgram which will increase the level. The chief drawbacks to the 57 as a vocal mic are the ability to get even more proximity effect than a 58, more popping and wind noise and spit goober into a generally uncleanable (without special tools) internal foam filter and metal screen. For these reasons, I prefer the 58 over the 57. An alternative is to use an external foam windscreen on the 57 which eliminates all of the above problems but it begins to look and sound more and more like a 58 too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members twostone Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 Yea I seen lots of bands and different folks use them as vocal mics.My favorite spot for them is on a snare, but then again they sound good on just about any thing you throw in front of them including vocals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Axisplayer Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 ... but then again they sound good on just about any thing you throw in front of them including vocals. They are the "desert island mic." If my mic case only allowed one mic choice to be used for everything, the SM57 would be it for me. Not my favorite on much of anything given a large budget, but certainly acceptable on almost anything. What more can you ask of a mic? I carry 6 of them as standard pack to every show, even when I only expect to use 1 or 2. You never know what you will find until you get there......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ryan. Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 I did a show with a guy who preferred the SM57 for a vocal mic. I thought it was a bit strange, but whatever... he said he just liked the color it produced. But then I played with him again at a recent show and he brought along the 55SH to a gig and was telling our singer how amazing it was. Best vocal mic he had ever heard. What I think he meant to say was "best vocal mic he'd ever seen." We use our 835s and call it good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members tlbonehead Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 Tom Petty is another big-namer. There's plenty of others, too.first one I thought of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wades_keys Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 Tom Petty is another big-namer. There's plenty of others, too. Roger Daltrey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Rezrover Posted September 8, 2010 Members Share Posted September 8, 2010 Roger Daltrey. SM-58 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Dogoth Posted September 9, 2010 Members Share Posted September 9, 2010 I've used 57s a few times and they work fine (with the drawbacks pointed out by agedhorse). Now the Beta 57 is another animal all together. They are excellent on vocals. They are bright, clear and articulate and have great rejection characteristics. I don't care for them on much else (IMO the original 57 is a overall better "swiss army mic"), but for Vocals they work great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators MarkGifford-1 Posted September 12, 2010 Moderators Share Posted September 12, 2010 Bruce Springsteen used one for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MainEventSound Posted September 12, 2010 Members Share Posted September 12, 2010 Gene Simmons (KISS), Robin Zander (Cheap Trick) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.