Jump to content

Modified a bass cabinet.


isaac42

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators

The old driver, the JBL 2032H, is a high efficiency driver. Gets loud, but doesn't go particularly low. Useful in certain situations. A JBL 2205A is a much better choice if one wants that bottom octave. OTOH, whether or not the driver I used actually qualifies as a 2205A is dubious, at best.

 

Some technical details I didn't bother with on the bass board. A 4 ft3 cabinet can be tuned to 41.2 Hz (low E fundamental) with a 3" id tube 0.55" long. The baffle board is ⅝" thick, or 0.625", so a 3" hole would tune it a bit lower, around 40.7 Hz. That wouldn't be a problem, but the port velocity is quite high when the port is that small. That can cause chuffing sounds at high volumes. As it happens, I have a couple of heavy duty cardboard tubes that are 3" id, 3⅝" od, so I decided to cut the hole 3⅝", allowing for installing a tube later.

 

All of these tunings yield a pretty nice -3dB shelf response with an actual 2205A. Same with a 2205H or K140 (which I also have laying around). -6dB is at 40 Hz. If one has a 9 or 10 band EQ (standard graphic EQ), 3dB boost at 62 Hz would make it almost flat in the 40-80 Hz octave.

 

I could also tune it down to 30.8 Hz (low B fundamental) for fun, but the bass response isn't nearly as flat. It rolls off at 3dB/octave starting above 100Hz. And I don't think the driver is built to move enough air to go that low. Xmax just isn't big enough. So if I did, that would be a temporary thing, just as an experiment.

 

Another possible change would be adding a second 3" port. That would significantly lower the port air velocity. But I didn't hear any chuffing at the gig Saturday night, so maybe there's no need in this application.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...