Harmony Central Forums
Announcement Announcement Module
Collapse
No announcement yet.

The best motherboard for audio recording

Page Title Module
Move Remove Collapse







X
Conversation Detail Module
Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The best motherboard for audio recording

    Hello everyone, I am in the process of picking out the items I will need for building a pc dedicated to audio recording. I'm certainly not rich but I'm looking for pro results!! My first question would be: what motherboard/processor would be best suited? I've been looking and it seems that a lot of what is available inlude integraded audio or video. I feel like this is something I would regret, given all of the things that could happen. Any one have any ideas?Plenty of speed and mucho PCI slots would be great too.

  • #2
    personally ive always used AMD's myself and found great performence.

    as for MB's your BEST bet is to go to AMD.com and look at their recommended mb list, personally i always get the BEST #'s out of ASUS
    <div class="signaturecontainer">FrankenTele - HUM in the Bridge, Lipstick in the Mid Dream 180 at the neck - Bigsby - Thinline<br />
    Peavey Generation EXP w/ Piezo in the bridge<br />
    Peavey JF1 - es335 clone<br />
    Agile 2000 Holdtop / twin P90's<br />
    Jay Turser White JT140 colonel<br />
    Roland S550<br />
    Behringer 8 channel mixer<br />
    Roland MA - 8 Active Monitors<br />
    AMD X2 5600 Powered Linux Work Station<br />
    Korg K61</div>

    Comment


    • #3
      You can still add a "proper" sound card to a motherboard with integrated audio/video so don't worry about that regard. In 99% this will disable the integrated audio, but that's no great loss.

      No motherboard will be pro-quality audio, you'll need to add an external unit

      Comment


      • #4
        You can check this forum out also ( www.bigbluelounge.com ). There's some good info over there about external audio solutions. I would agree with el tonto, that no motherboard will have pro-quality audio. Granted that things always improve and you could still use integrated audio in a pinch. The main reason for getting an external is for ( improved signal quality, flatter frequency response, higher quality internal pre-amps, low latancy ) + all the other bells and whistles. If you really need to go budget you risk loosing "true fidelity". But I've recorded venues with nothing more than a Griffen iMic, Art phantom pre-amp, and a Rode NT2/Rode NT3. The results were actually pretty good.
        <div class="signaturecontainer">Guitars: <br />
        1996 MIA Fender Lonestar Strat 3TS : 2006 Agile AL-3000map Cherry Sunburst : 200? Agile AS-820 Black/Chrome B-stock : 2008 Agile AS-1000 Black Cherry<br />
        Effects: Beaten up Digitech RP-6 (GAS for Vox tonelab LE) : Behringer TO800, RV600<br />
        Bass: OLP MusicMan, 4 string, Black<br />
        Amp: 1965 Ampeg Rocket II, all original : 2008 Pignose G40V, 6L6, 12ax7<br />
        Mic: Rode NT2, Behringer C2 pair<br />
        Recording: Tascam DA-P1 DAT: MacBook Pro, Griffin iMic, Garage Band</div>

        Comment


        • #5


          Yes it's real.

          http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/aopenax4btube/

          I don't think they make it anymore tho.
          <div class="signaturecontainer">Peavey Patriot<br />
          Warwick RB Fortress 5 String<br />
          Peavey Mark IV Bass 400<br />
          <br />
          Rocktron Piranha<br />
          Rocktron Pro-Gap Ultra FS/T<br />
          Rocktron Velocity 300</div>

          Comment

          Working...
          X