Jump to content

Mac OS X Leopard is out. Do you care?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm surprised that there haven't been any dedicated posts on Leopard yet with all of the Mac heads hanging around. I've looked at all of the new features, which look nice, but I've yet to see anything compelling to make me want to upgrade. OTOH, I felt the same way when Vista came out, but now that I've been using it for a while I am really enjoying it. Any experiences, thoughts, etc on Leopard :poke:?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I do care because many users have started to complain that their interfaces do not work on Leopard.

 

WTF with the urgency on switching this fast to the new system?

 

 

And I am not switching to Leopard (and Vista) until strictly necessary.

That should mean about at least another 6 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, I care because I have Apple stock. :thu:

Apple sold 2 million copies of Leopard the first weekend it was released. Ka-ching!!

 

I installed Leopard on my MacBook Pro on Saturday and so far, everything seems to work fine with the exception of some minor bugs in Parallels Desktop running Windows XP and a minor bug in AAS Tassman. Logic Studio and Final Cut Express work great with Leopard, and also Adobe CS3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

WTF with the urgency on switching this fast to the new system?

 

 

Ya mean the one that's been announced for months?

 

I'm on it. Needed to upgrade due to bootcamp expiring. I backed up my system and installed to an external drive from my MBP - I'll be installing that hd to replace my internal this weekend.

 

My results so far -

 

Logic Studio 8 works great - but there's a problem with Melodyne's ReWire component that screws up Logic on launch. Once removed, L8's fine.

 

Melodyne's fine in standalone mode - rewire hosed, but they know it and they're working on it.

 

KLC's working fine

Amplitube 2 seems to be fine

Stylus RMX, check.

 

Ableton Live 6 is working fine from what I can tell.

 

Motu 828MkII working fine.

AMT-8's and Unitor-8 working fine.

 

I also upgraded my MDD G4. So far, even my Layla24 seems to be working. Haven't had to update my driver on that since what, panther?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I backed up my system and installed to an external drive from my MBP - I'll be installing that hd to replace my internal this weekend.

 

 

Just make sure that your new drive is partitioned for: Partition Map Scheme : GUID Partition Table (for Intel Macs) in Disk Utility, and not the standard default Apple partition (for G5 Macs), or else you won't be able to boot Leopard from the drive.

 

This might help with the installation:

 

http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Mac/MacBook-Pro/Hard-Drive/85/5/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I do care because many users have started to complain that their interfaces do not work on Leopard.


WTF with the urgency on switching this fast to the new system?



And I am not switching to Leopard (and Vista) until strictly necessary.

That should mean about at least another 6 months.

 

 

I've been using computers on a pretty much daily basis for work and pleasure sine 1985. I started using a computer (a PC to my utter surprise) for MIDI sequencing in 1990 and moved my 2 ADAT project studio to an 8 channel DAW in 1996, after Windows 95 added dedicated multichannel audio and vastly improved MIDI layers.

 

And if there's one thing I've learned from my own experience and that of others on both sides of the OS line -- if it works, think twice before trying to fix it.

 

 

Smart corporate information managers typically set up small test farms where they can carefully maintain observation of upgrades to applications and especially OS's being considered for enterprise adoption.

 

Both major OS providers have fundamentally different philosophies that both have obvious downsides.

 

Apple tends to push forward in frequent spurts and cut support for previously used components. That can occasionally wreak havoc for users and particularly for third party soft and hardware vendors. But it does mean there are less potential loose ends for their development teams to trip over.

 

Microsoft, on the other hand, has a nearly pathological obsession with maintaining backwards compatibility. When I say pathological -- I mean it. Current example: MS built backwards compatibility into IE 7 for bug workarounds developers had used to try to bring previous IE versions into something approaching compatibility with web standards -- but they subverted the current goal of full standards compatibility to do it!

 

 

These differing philosophies work out in different ways. Apple is clearly the best and most innovative application developer working for the Mac. Their apps, at times, help set the standards for what we expect in usability. MS, on the other hand, is better at fostering third party developers (hence the obsession with backwards compatibility) and making dev tools readily available to a wide variety of those developers -- while Apple treats their third party developers more as half-trusted acolytes (to understandable effect in the commercial Mac dev community).

 

Unfortunately for Windows users, the current leadership at MS has a serious case of Mac envy.

 

They manifestly don't know what Windows users want or what they need -- and the general dread of Vista among Windows users -- particularly those who depend on their computers for real work -- has manifested into huge resistance to that OS.

 

XP, when it was introduced, veritably flew off the shelves (esp. compared to Vista). But today, those buying new computers have gone to great lengths to avoid Vista -- buying refurbished machines, or from the mom and pop vendors who have an extended window of XP sales. Enormous user demand even forced Dell to reverse policy and reintroduce XP on many of their machines.

 

Of course -- business/corporate users were still able to buy XP machines even before that because corporate info services managers had set flat out: No way. We're not moving working operations onto an OS that our own testing labs say is quirky and poorly supported and is a huge drain on modest computer resources.

 

 

People do not buy Windows for flash and fun. They may buy Windows applications for flash and fun -- or more likely to get work done -- both aspects are clearly well covered in Windows land... there is an enormous universe of available software.

 

In the Mac, it's all about the Mac and the putatively groovy UI. In Windows, it's about the application.

 

 

Both approaches have pluses. Both have negatives.

 

But Apple understands their role.

 

Microsoft -- clearly -- does not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Mac OS X Leopard is out. Do you care?

 

 

We care that our Mac's continue to make music without problems with hardware or software. Let someone else find and fix the problems while we play music. (Insert image of Nero playing fiddle with a flaming Rome in the background.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

{censored}, my main music machine is still on 10.3.9. I've always dreaded the upgrade and all the potential problems that could come up with my g5 tower. And since I was getting things done just fine, I skipped 10.4. I'll probably go for 10.5, but will certainly wait sometime before my main machine goes that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Amen

 

unfortunately, I do work for a company which has to find and fix such problems :D ... but as a user, I agree with you.

 

 

And yes, it has been announced for months. But Apple does not release the final version for testing purposes until it is released publicly; that means, there are no "final testings" with more than 4 days at this moment and to "certify" a driver for an operating system takes way more than that.

 

Fortunately some devices keep working in the new system... but many others doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My music Mac is on 10.3.9 (and working great). My business Mac is on 10.4.1 (and working great). I'm interested in Leopard, but I'll let other folks do the extended beta test (i.e. initial public release of any OS) and then think about moving up.

 

Seems neat... I just don't want to break what doesn't need fixin'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, I didn't realize they made such significant changes with such short notice. It must be frustrating to have revised drivers along the way, only to have final version break them. :rolleyes:

 

As for 'why' Leopard is compelling...Spaces combined with Screen Sharing. And then combine that midi-over-lan that they've had for awhile, and it's very powerful stuff.

 

For instance, I'm sitting here in my kitchen using my MBP. I have 4 spaces set up at the moment...

1: Safari - I'm posting from that

2: Logic Pro 8

3: vnc accessing my studio's G4, complete with dual displays, running Live 6 on 1 screen, and AMS on the other

4: AMS on my MBP.

 

Pretty friggin slick.

 

 

Ed A - yeah, I'm already booting from it. My MBP's internal was an 80GB. I have a 160G 7200 RPM SATA in a firewire enclosure - that's what I'm booting from, is running Leopard, and will be swapping into the MBP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My setup is far too complex for me to want to take the risks of early adoption. It's stable and I'm getting work done, so that's good enough for now.

 

I do care about Leopard, but I'll probably wait to install it until I'm ready to upgrade all of my software synths, effects, DAWs, and non-music applications. With all of that hassle ahead, I may just wait until I'm ready to migrate from my G5 to an Intel Mac.

 

Best,

 

Geoff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

My setup is far too complex for me to want to take the risks of early adoption. It's stable and I'm getting work done, so that's good enough for now.


I do care about Leopard, but I'll probably wait to install it until I'm ready to upgrade all of my software synths, effects, DAWs, and non-music applications. With all of that hassle ahead, I may just wait until I'm ready to migrate from my G5 to an Intel Mac.


Best,


Geoff

 

 

+ a million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

not a care in the world to get it. ha! apples site is busted right now. lmao, CSS must not be loading. looks like a bloated POS. i wish BOTH companies would but out a "CORE" OS... just pure OS with no BS. then you have to add "modules" do it for add-ons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

wow, looking at their "300+ features" in it, this is the biggest microsoft envy i have seen in a LONG time from them. front row? can you say MCE? screen charing? RDC anyone? sidebar? another widows "thing"... but god, this looks so BLOATED.

 

and they make some grand claims [that are false] just like their ads... such misinformation.

 

like i said before, i wish both companies would release as real OS, no BS. get rid of all the i{censored}.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Amen


unfortunately, I do work for a company which has to find and fix such problems
:D
... but as a user, I agree with you.



And yes, it has been announced for months. But Apple does not release the final version for testing purposes until it is released publicly; that means, there are no "final testings" with more than 4 days at this moment and to "certify" a driver for an operating system takes way more than that.


Fortunately
some
devices keep working in the new system... but many others doesn't.

 

This is the sort of thing I was talking about... Apple is (apparently) making final tweaks right up to release date. MS releases final release candidate after candidate, drilling relentlessly through 3rd party developer backwards compatability complaints.

 

Apple also removes support for older features, workarounds, and such -- while MS, driven by the 3rd party base -- and fear of consumer complaints -- since, unlike Apple with its loyal core users, MS gets cut very little slack from a loyal user base and is, therefore, reluctant to change anything.

 

That makes Apple way lighter on its feet -- but it's not without tradeoff, obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

just like their ads... such misinformation.


like i said before, i wish both companies would release as real OS, no BS. get rid of all the i{censored}.

 

 

Win MCE may have fielded the first 'all-in-one' media center oriented OS but it was a colossal flop, causing it to be product-dumped to bargain hunting box makers, who proceeded to put it on non-MCE-ready machines like my trusty $343 Dell refurb tower which had no video inputs and no Firewire -- two requirements for MCE cert -- yet it was sold with MCE, anyhow, simply because, apparently, Dell got a good deal on close-out copies of MCE.

 

I dunno, maybe it's just my Windows-centric life -- but I find MS's rather pathetic case of Mac envy (as manifested in Vista) to be considerably more troubling than I suspect Mac users will find in parallels on Leopard.

 

I just wish MS would figure out that folks who want Macs buy Macs and folks who still want XP instead of the bloated miasma that Vista is just want an OS that solidly supports the apps that are the real focus of their everyday work and entertainment lives.

 

 

It seems to me that MS's two biggest mistakes in the last decade -- Vista and the billion dollar Zune -- derive from MS drawing the exact wrong lessons from Apple's resurgence. The Zune was MS's attempt to me-too not just Apple's proprietary DRM-lock in (even as the world turns away from DRM) but their 800 pound gorilla iTunes store. There clearly was no room for two proprietary lock n products and MS does not command the kind of extreme user loyalty that helped get the iPod and iTunes critical mass in its early days -- and the Zune has continued to dribble out of stores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Front Row's been there since Tiger. Screen Sharing has been there too, but via Remote Desktop ($$$). I use PC's too, and a major difference I see is that the OSX 'bloat' has no discernible negative impact on performance. It's actually snappier on my MDD G4 than Tiger was (which was snappier than Panther). So while it may look bloated, the underpinnings are significantly optimized as they go forward.

 

I'm not at all religious regarding OS's, it's just from practical usage and observation. But I must say that OSX is a case of MS envy is pretty funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It seems to me that MS's two biggest mistakes in the last decade -- Vista and the billion dollar Zune -- derive from MS drawing the exact
wrong
lessons from Apple's resurgence. The Zune was MS's attempt to me-too not just Apple's proprietary DRM-lock in (even as the world turns away from DRM) but their 800 pound gorilla iTunes store. There clearly was no room for two proprietary lock n products and MS does not command the kind of extreme user loyalty that helped get the iPod and iTunes critical mass in its early days -- and the Zune has continued to dribble out of stores.

 

 

Indications are that MS has now shifted its focus from Apple-envy to Google-envy. They're throwing crazy amounts of money into playing catch up with them. They've really strayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

b2b, i have been playing with MCE for a bit now... currently running vista ultimate version and its pretty {censored}ing cool. initially, it was way ahead of its time and kinda just put out there. its matured quite a bit now since the earlier revs i played with. i run it on a P4/1GB RAM, a 4400 GPU on it i think [certainly doesnt allow aero interface]... and soon to build a dedicated MCE machine with proper hardware [including 3TB+ of storage] adn a smoking video card for games. however, i have been entertaining the centralized server running to multiple MCE's/Xboxes throughout the house via gigabit ethernet.

 

as for Front Row:

Front Row is a software application for Apple's Macintosh computers that acts as a front-end for QuickTime, DVD Player and the iTunes and iPhoto libraries and allows for users to browse media on their computers using the Apple Remote. The concept behind the product is similar to that of Microsoft's Windows Media Center, but without the TV recording capability. The software is included on all shipping Macs (although not enabled on the Mac Pro). It was announced by Steve Jobs at an Apple special event on October 12, 2005.

 

Apple TV uses a new version of Front Row and also uses the Apple Remote. Apple has announced that this Front Row will be included with Mac OS X Leopard.

 

Unlike Front Row in Tiger, Leopard now features additional TV Shows, Music, Podcasts, Settings, and Sources menus which can be accessed in the menu screen, in addition to Movies, TV Shows, Music, and DVD. The new Front Row resembles the Apple TV's graphical interface, featuring dynamic 3D Cover Flow-like shuffling of Album Arts and Photos on the left of the screen while scrolling through the menu. Also, whereas the original Front Row was accessible only via the remote or the keyboard shortcut, the Leopard version is a standalone application.

 

 

Zune is supposed to have a new release the 13th i believe of Nov with an 80!GB drive in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...