Jump to content

Working With My Old Pal Oscar Peterson.......


Bruce Swedien

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm listening to The Cole Porter Songbook now...

 

It's extraordinary how graceful and assured this is... the gentle probing in "In the Still of the Night" followed by the hard swinging, bop "It's Alright with Me."

 

Great chops, great feel. All around.

 

And well captured... for a 22 year old kid from the sticks... ;)

 

 

Thanks, once again, Bruce, for your extaordinary generosity in sharing the musical history you've witnessed.

 

 

PS... "Love for Sale"... yeah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

RIP, OP

One of THE great players of all time.

Thanks for the memories on Universal's Studio A, Bruce.

I was working on a recording at Universal in 1980 and had the pleasure of observing a James Cleveland gospel session in Studio A. A great room with a tremendous history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It IS an art, whether or not that has always been recognized by people or not.

 

What we do, as engineers, can definitely contribute to, or detract from, the artistic and emotional content of the music. Of course, working with great artists like Oscar Peterson makes the engineer's life and work a lot easier... but it doesn't change the fact that the engineer is also an artist, and they'd best bring their "A Game" to the table if they're working with other artists of that caliber, lest they prove to be the weak link in the chain / worst player on the team.

 

Obviously, Bruce is a star player and a strong link. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bruce, your records with Oscar are the ones of I his I love the most.

 

He taught me so much about jazz piano.... I'd listen on end to grasp what I could of what he was doing. Most of it I couldn't grasp, as it was part of his magical style.

 

I always think of his style as being so "gentlemanly", always, and it was a mood that I tried to emulate in my own live performances (in front of considerably humbler audiences).

 

RIP, Oscar!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bruce,

it is nice to hear from you.

 

Oscar was one of the greatest, what a loss. He was also a good friend of Sweetwater. Bruce, like our relationship, it is one of those I will always cherish. Believe it or not Oscar was a big gear junkie...but it didn't matter he could make anything sound great. Even after his stroke he played really well.

 

Chuck Surack

Sweetwater

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a wonderful resource to have someone like you to relate your experiences from a time I'll never know about people I only hear about in magazines, on radio or tv. Oscar will be sorely missed musically by many, but more so by you and other personal acquaintances, friends and family. It's always great to hear something new about extraordinary people from those who knew them well.

 

Thanks... and RIP Oscar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Me too Ken. It is one of the few careers I can think of that demands extensive use of both sides of the brain if you want to excel at it.
:)

 

This might sound sort of strange...but one of the things I've noticed is that I seem to like "documenting" things. Whether it's recording, photography, or creating my website with all the travelogues on it, it's a form of documentation. Maybe others feel this way too?

 

And all of these forms of documentation seem to require some technical expertise. Well, okay, not so much the website because someone could pretty much do what I do on Shutterfly. At any rate, I like the confluence of the artistic and the technical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At any rate, I like the confluence of the artistic and the technical.

 

And you do very well at it Ken. I was just checking out the Nectarphonic CD again last night - good stuff. And for the first time, I noticed the credits for the engineer vs. the guitarist... ;):lol:

 

Photography is another of the disciplines that require both technical and creative chops. :)

 

Back to engineering, I think part of it can be documentary in nature, but that to me is just one "approach"... some folks just want to capture what the band or artist is doing, and that can be great, if that's what's called for. OTOH, you can take a more active approach and modify, add to / subtract from, and sculpt the sound in various ways, creating the illusion of a performance that never actually happened. I think both approaches have merit. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members



Back to engineering, I think part of it can be documentary in nature, but that to me is just one "approach"... some folks just want to capture what the band or artist is doing, and that can be great, if that's what's called for. OTOH, you can take a more active approach and modify, add to / subtract from, and sculpt the sound in various ways, creating the illusion of a performance that never actually happened. I think both approaches have merit.
:)

 

Definitely. When I mean "documentary", I mean it in the broad sense that you are capturing something. As you can tell by the Nectarphonic CD (or any of my own stuff), capturing "reality" is not really one of the main goals. IOW, I'm not trying to capture a live performance, even though a lot of it is of course live. I'm interested in "documenting" things too, but both things interest me. Sculpting, modifying, subtracting, creating sonic tapestries - that's fun. But so is capturing a great live act for posterity. I've seen people argue this back and forth, and never understood the argument: don't we like and appreciate all of it, as appreciators of music, as engineers, as artists?

 

Photography is similar. Obviously, I'm especially into travel photography, which is more "documentary" in nature. But although I don't have a lot of it on my website, I'll eff up, distort, PhotoShop, etc. a photo. I'll shoot through fantastic lenses, put odd filters on my camera, shoot through water, or PhotoShop my photos to look surreal, psychedelic, or dreamy. I do this with band photos and more artistic photos all the time. It's all good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At any rate, I like the confluence of the artistic and the technical.
...


...Back to engineering, I think part of it can be documentary in nature, but that to me is just one "approach"... some folks just want to capture what the band or artist is doing, and that can be great, if that's what's called for. OTOH, you can take a more active approach and modify, add to / subtract from, and sculpt the sound in various ways, creating the illusion of a performance that never actually happened. I think both approaches have merit.
:)

 

The key is understanding where your priority lies. You're not the artist or ultimate client. Once you know what their goal is you can adjust accordingly.

 

Even at it's most transparent the recording process is inherently false. No microphone hears the way we do, so everything is up to interpretation. But there's a not so fine line between creating a recording that infers the reality of a live performance sans amplification and one that actively paints a surreal aural picture that may simply be a hyped version of inferred reality or could be a complete fabrication that in no way resembles the parts that were used to create the sum.

 

I participated in one of the online Tsunami relief songs recorded at MP. I recorded myself on dulcimer, acoustic guitar, electric guitar with a clean, slow attack, "swell" sound, a slightly distorted electric and more. The scratch tracks I recorded to were not exactly the acoustic guitar, bass and drum tracks that were eventually used and the mixer took great liberties moving around some of what I played. I was especially happy with the outro he constructed using some percussion and one or two parts of my tracks. Creative and interesting.

 

It's all about the client's objectives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...