Jump to content

Another blog question:


the stranger

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Be careful what you wish for Stranger... I just left a comment on your blog!

 

:D

 

 

[Feel free to not approve it, though. Not that it wasn't a sincere comment coming from right where I live -- and maybe even toned down 'cause I know you and love you. In a secure-in-my-manhood, hetero kinda way, mind you. ;) ]

 

 

But... seriously... you can post in comments threads on news articles and always leave your URL, and post in public affairs/political BBs and make sure you have your URL in your sig line or at the bottom of your posts.

 

Then again... everyone with an opinion (and some who don't) seems to have a blog. Have you ever been to my political blog? Probably not. Judging from my numbers. If you visited, I'd probably see the bump. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been meaning to check out your blog. And do I have my comments on approve first? Hmm..I'm not to concerned about approving them first...whatever people feel they need to say. :)

 

Oh yeah, I love you too, man. :love:

 

I'm trying to make sure mine isn't just politics, I try to get a good variety of stuff in there...vids with no video, humor, etc...

 

Now you got me curious about this "toned down comment". ;)

 

Was it relating to my sanity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a feed output aggregator -- for instance, mine's got my song blog, my new YouTube account (no vids of my cute cat on this one), my Last.fm thing (not that anything happens there but I SHOULD make it happen -- does anyone goe THERE -- I mean to Last.fm, not my page -- I'm pretty sure I know the answer to that one! :D), and, I think my political blog. Or not... I was trying to get the political blog (which is just a typical 1/5th comment, 4/5ths quote op's news blog) to show up on my TK+friends page but... I must not understand... maybe I AM spreading myself way too thin... when an obsessive-compulsive starts going ADD, watch out. (And I'm referring to attention deficit disorder, not analog-digital-digital. ;) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B

Then again...
everyone
with an opinion (and some who don't) seems to have a blog. Have you ever been to my political blog? Probably not. Judging from my numbers. If you visited, I'd probably see the bump.
:D

 

I think that's one of the problems with blog in general (much like the criticisms of podcasting and I suppose DIY music recording) -- merely availability isn't going to be a big driver to the blog

esp if it mainly commentary on works widely published elsewhere

 

There is just isn't enough value add there.

 

One thing you can do it raise the production values -- focus the blog more, get more original material (interview/ collborate-host recognized experts), increase the breadth and depth of any original research.

 

It's time consuming and effort intensive, but that's where the value can be. Otherwise it can just come of as "armchair quarterback ranting to other armchaird QBs" (it's a common gripe with Garageband for instance...that he only exposure you really get is to other acts looking for exposure)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a feed output aggregator -- for instance, mine's got my song blog, my new YouTube account (no vids of my cute cat on this one), my Last.fm thing (not that anything happens there but I SHOULD make it happen -- does anyone goe THERE -- I mean to Last.fm, not
my
page -- I'm pretty sure I know the answer to
that
one
!
:D
), and, I
think
my political blog. Or not... I was trying to get the political blog (which is just a typical 1/5th comment, 4/5ths quote op's news blog) to show up on my TK+friends page but... I must not understand... maybe I AM spreading myself way too thin... when an obsessive-compulsive starts going ADD, watch out. (And I'm referring to attention deficit disorder, not analog-digital-digital.
;)
)

 

Don't feel bad, I often ponder the fact that I have so many internet fixations, it's hard to manage them all. (remember the wiki thread? i really didn't follow through on that one)

 

I think a good idea would be a site that let you log into myspace/youtube/your blog/etc from one central place. A social networking site to maintain all your social networking sites.

 

One thing I found super cool is that now you can post to your blog right from youtube (at least I can with google/blogger) and that is way cool, considering I do a lot of vid posting on the blog.

 

It would be great if myspace let you replace your myspace blog with your own (if you maintain one outside of myspace), or at least do like the youtube thing.

 

Which comes back to the original idea, which is some way to aggregate your own content across multiple sources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Some of the music blogs are extremely interesting because the person will discuss cool, overlooked, rare, and interesting music...and have music examples or downloads. I rarely read blogs, but if I do, they're almost always these sorts of blogs.

 

 

That's one focus I do have on my blog. Music would probably be the first, then politics, then humor.

 

I've noticed that really a lot of blogs are information aggregation. Folks who want to share the specific finds of their web excursions, or share information. I like doing that, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

That's one focus I do have on my blog. Music would probably be the first, then politics, then humor.

 

 

Therein could be a problem - those are 3 very broad and demanding masters to serve

 

have you considered breaking them into 3 different blogs or at least areas?

 

This could be esp valuable if, for instance, there are viewers who don't find you politics interesting, but may find your music interesting (esp with charged areas where there is a lot of opinion or difference in taste, the mingling of the subjects may be steering away readership as much as it's drawing readership)

 

 

I've noticed that really a lot of blogs are information aggregation.

 

 

 

That's where I kind of find the downside -- many blogs don't have the horsepower that larger scale info aggregators and are often not particularly deeply researched, so you get "headline aggregation" (ie the depth really isn't there)

 

Folks who want to share the specific finds of their web excursions, or share information.

 

I think that might be the crux of the aggregation problem, it can suffer from social clustering and the research suffers

 

"I like to do that too" may sum it up a little in that it's very very easy for a blog to become, or at least have the appearance of being, a self-serving soapbox which can really disengage an audience

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Therein could be a problem - those are 3 very broad and demanding masters to serve


have you considered breaking them into 3 different blogs or at least areas.


This could be esp valuable if, for instance, there are viewers who don't find you politics interesting, but may find your music interesting (esp with charged areas where there is a lot of opinion or difference in taste, the mingling of the subjects may be steering away readership)


I've noticed that really a lot of blogs are information aggregation.


That's where I kind of find the downside -- many blogs don't have the horsepower that larger scale info aggregators and are often not particularly deeply researched, so you get "headline aggregation" (ie the depth really isn't there)


Folks who want to share the specific finds of their web excursions, or share information.


I think that might be the crux of the aggregation problem, it can suffer from social clustering and the aggregation can follow that clustering

 

Interesting. I'm kind of fond of the variety aspect of it. Yeah, I could see where the conflict thing could come in. I try not to just post links to "headlines" like you say...I do add my two cents, for what it's worth.

 

I can see the aggregation problem. That's interesting because in these couple threads about blogging we have going, I'm actually talking in favor of the "clustering", but your comments are good commentary on other aspects of social networking. You can actually limit the variety of information you are receiving. At least for your average user...

 

I know those of us who post regular are not the types to limit what type of information we are getting. The forum is great for providing a wide range of information, since musicians and music pretty much span the range of demographics.

 

And really the mix of content shouldn't be a problem, since the real content is me. If they are reading my blog on a regular basis, then I don't think they are going to be easily offended. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I try not to just post links to "headlines" like you say...

 

 

(just to be clear when I mean "the headlines" I mean fairly cursory reasearch as opposed to, literally, headlines)

 

I do add my two cents, for what it's worth.

 

 

Sadly, in the blogosphere, not much - I think that's one of the problems - it's basically saturated with pennies

 

The blogger tends to add their "insightful analysis" because they are so astute and I think the reader is sometimes casts themselves there "hey, that's my role, I'm the astute one - you are just ranting"

So it becomes that armchair QB talking to another armchair QB thing and the blogs kind of become seen as "oh, that guy and his soapbox"

 

The use of original research or deeper research or having recognized experts contribute directly or other value adding could help in that regard

 

 

And really the mix of content shouldn't be a problem, since the real content is me.

 

I think that may be the central problem (ugh, that came out wrong) - that the content is "you" (the persona of the blog author) . That can point to the self-serving nature of blogs - and why readership can often be low or sporadic.

 

If they are reading my blog on a regular basis

 

I suppose that's why I'm commenting...because of the IF -- "if they are reading on a regular basis"...

 

We're trying to boost your readership!!

 

How can I get more traffic to my blog, short of advertising?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that's one of the problems with blog in general (much like the criticisms of podcasting and I suppose DIY music recording) -- merely availability isn't going to be a big driver to the blog

esp if it mainly commentary on works widely published elsewhere


There is just isn't enough value add there.


One thing you can do it raise the production values -- focus the blog more, get more original material (interview/ collborate-host recognized experts), increase the breadth and depth of any original research.


It's time consuming and effort intensive, but that's where the value can be. Otherwise it can just come of as "armchair quarterback ranting to other armchaird QBs" (it's a common gripe with Garageband for instance...that he only exposure you really get is to other acts looking for exposure)

 

Oh, yeah... I actually do my music for myself and always have. (Starting out, I was certainly the only sane person who would listen.)

 

And I've taken the same approach with my real blog (the song blog) -- at least to some extent -- I wanted to feel like if no one visited it, that it would still be worthwhile for me on some level. (And it has really revolutionized one thing -- I always know where to find my lyrics, now!)

 

And my political blog --which is primarily quotations and excerpts strung together with a little outrage -- I mostly started as a way to save and have accessible information for political, uh, discussion. (I now don't argue politics anywhere anymore, except, of course, just recently in Stranger's politics thread in this forum. And, indeed, I found it very convenient to just refer back to my posts to get the ammo, er -- info -- I needed.

 

But I started my first political blog back in the months leading up to the (we all knew it was) inevitable Iraq invasion, for all those reasons. (That one was called the "Infinitely Unfolding News Rant." After a while, I sort of lost the will to argue with idiots -- and that was at MySpace where the political forum seems like an online tea party put on by the Episcopalian Ladies Auxiliary compared to... well, a certain political forum cyber-geographically near to our hearts. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think slight-return is bringing some good perspectives to the whole blog discussion. These are the types of things I find probably more useful than the "more traffic" basics.

 

Because when it's all said and done, who is the biggest audience and biggest critic of me?

 

Me. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Trying to help where I can

 

While I fantasize that I do -- I don't really have "The Answer"

 

so just thought I'd throw out some ideas (maybe they'll help, maybe not) and perspectives (being that I'm omniscient, you should probably heed them or be crucified)

 

Why I thought my opinion might be valid enough to weigh in was...

 

I'm the potential audience!!!

 

I have no interest in generating a blog myself...but blogging, (audio) podcasting

 

but I really really want it to work not as a potential content producer, but as consumer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, another quick thing I woke up on (and this is just general to blogs)-- It seems like a lot of blog formatting is directed toward "journal entries" but the authors wind up putting essays in them.

 

It's just (probably a poor choice of words, I don't think "merely" really applies) a formatting thing, but another format might work better than Kerouac scroll of entries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...