Login or Sign Up
Welcome, !
Join the HC Newsletter
Subscribe Now!

Examining the advantages and disadvantages of each

By Phil O'Keefe


Occasionally you'll find a topic that's hotly debated by musicians, and certainly one of the bigger ones is the subject of printed circuit board construction verses point to point wiring in amplifiers and effects. Once electronic circuits go beyond the simplest forms and use more than just a handful of components that can be directly soldered together, some sort of substrate must be used to help facilitate organizing and mounting all of the parts. Printed circuit boards and various substrates combined with point to point wiring can both be used for this purpose, and each approach has its fans, but what are the differences between them, and is either one really "better" than the other?

Point to point wiring

In older electronic devices (including most vintage Fender amps), vulcanized fiberboard eyelet boards were often used to mount the electronic components. They require hand insertion of the various parts and hand soldering, so considerable human labor is involved with this manufacturing approach. Fiberboards have their share of issues. They can warp over time, which can lead to stress on components and solder joints, which can cause them to fail. They can also absorb moisture from the air over time, which can lead to micro-voltage conductance and leakage between components across the board. This can sometimes have an adverse effect on the sound of the amp - the 100k plate resistors leaking to the 68k grid resistor issue that frequently leads to soft popping, ticking and "bacon frying" noises on vintage Fender amps is a well known example of this. Some feel that in certain cases this subtle micro voltage leakage can actually contribute positively to the sound of vintage style amps, and many companies still use these types of boards, even on modern amplifiers.

Figure 1: Fiberboard eyelet board and point to point wired components in a vintage Fender amplifier

Turret boards are also commonly used for point to point wiring. The board itself can be made from vulcanized fiberboard as with the eyelet type boards, or it can be made of other non-conductive materials that are less susceptible to the voltage leakage issue, such as fiberglass reinforced epoxy. The raised metal turrets on the board serve the same purpose as the eyelets; providing a place to attach and solder wires and various electronic components.

Figure 2: Turret board assembly


Perfboards are also commonly used as a substrate for point to point wiring. A perfboard is usually made of laminated paper and phenolic resin, or fiberglass and epoxy, and has multiple holes laid out in a grid pattern, with the holes typically spaced about 0.1" apart. This hole spacing facilitates the insertion of a wide range of electronic components. Each hole is copper-clad, with individual metal pads for each hole. Nicer perfboard usually has pads on both sides of the board. As with eyelet and turret boards, components are hand mounted, and the wiring is routed by hand from one component to another, so care must be taken to assure correct wiring by the builder.

Figure 3: Perfboard

Point to point wiring is still used for some amplifiers today, and not just by boutique builders. Vox, Fender and Marshall have all released amps within the last few years that utilized point to point wiring. Point to point wiring is not restricted to use in amplifiers; it is sometimes used in effects pedals too, such as the Ibanez TS808HW (a hand-wired, point to point Tube Screamer) and the Vox V847 HW wah, and is fairly commonly used by a variety of boutique effects pedal manufacturers.

One of the biggest advantages of point to point wiring is that it allows for relatively easy servicing, with no risk of "lifted circuit traces" as can sometimes occur when replacing parts mounted on printed circuit boards. It can also make modifying the circuit easier since the wiring configuration is determined by how the parts are connected and hand-wired, and not predetermined by the layout of the traces and pads on a circuit board.

The main disadvantage to point to point wiring is cost. It is far more labor intensive, and a high degree of skill on the part of the builder(s) is required for best results. Not only does the parts insertion need to be done by hand, then double-checked and the proper component values confirmed, but the wire routing needs to be neat and routed in such a way as to minimize interference, and the hand-soldering itself needs to be properly done. All of this takes time and skill, and the more time skilled people spend building a product, the more it tends to cost.

Printed circuit boards

Today, printed circuit boards (often referred to with the initials "PCB") are the most commonly used substrate for electronic circuits. PCBs use a non-conductive substrate on to which conductive copper pathways or "traces" are etched. Copper clad holes in the board are also included for the insertion of individual electronic components, if the PCB was designed for such parts. Some PCBs have their metal pads and traces on just one side of the board, while others have the metal soldering pads and traces on both sides of the board.

Figure 4: Discrete components on high-quality double-sided PCBs in a THD Univalve amplifier

The discrete electronic components that you'll typically find being used in products utilizing point to point wiring can also be used with printed circuit boards, and in many cases, they are. However, more and more products are being built utilizing surface mounted components on the surface of the PCB instead of discrete components mounted through holes. Surface mount technology (SMT) has several advantages over through-hole construction, including smaller components (allowing for more complex circuits in physically smaller packages) and the ability to more easily mount components on both sides of the board. The primary disadvantage of surface mount devices is that they're very difficult to service or modify by at-home DIY enthusiasts.

Figure 5: A PCB with surface mount components in a Electro-Harmonix EHX Tortion overdrive pedal

One significant advantage of PCB construction is the ability for much more of the construction process to be automated, thus decreasing assembly costs substantially. Surface mount technology allows for even more extensive automation in construction. Whether such automation results in an increase or decrease in quality is debatable, with detractors saying hand-assembly allows for more individual inspection, care and quality assurance checks, while proponents note that automation reduces the possibility of human error in parts installation and soldering. Using a PCB also insures consistent parts placement relative to other parts, and a pre-routed wiring configuration on the PCB that reduces the potential for wiring errors.  

Which approach is best?

Once again we're looking at a situation where there really is no clear winner. Both printed circuit boards and point to point wiring remain popular in the world of musical electronics. There are plenty of benefits with both printed circuit and point to point construction, and ultimately it usually comes down to weighing the advantages and disadvantages and deciding which method best suits the design that's being built. Circuit complexity and the device's target price point are both key considerations; the more complex the circuit, and the higher the parts count, the more expensive and time-consuming point to point construction becomes, and the more crucial the skill level of the builder(s) becomes as well. Automated printed circuit board construction and soldering methods remove a lot of the potential for human error and can greatly increase manufacturing efficiency, and thus lower costs.

While there are things to avoid when using either approach, there is no reason why a PCB build has to sound any worse than a point to point wired unit. Ultimately it comes down to the particulars of each individual product, and while other factors such as serviceability and ease of modification still bear consideration, a well designed and built PCB product can sound every bit as good as a well designed product that uses point to point wiring. Ultimately you'll need to consider a lot more than whether a product utilizes point to point wiring or a printed circuit board before you can really judge it fairly, so don't automatically disregard a product over the way it was built.  There are plenty of good products that use printed circuit boards, and loads that use point to point wiring.

Phil O'Keefe is a multi-instrumentalist, recording engineer / producer and the Senior Editor of Harmony Central. He has engineered, produced and performed on countless recording sessions in a diverse range of styles, with artists such as Alien Ant Farm, Jules Day, Voodoo Glow Skulls, John McGill, Michael Knott and Alexa's Wish. He is a former featured monthly columnist for EQ magazine, and his articles and product reviews have also appeared in Keyboard, Electronic Musician and Guitar Player magazines. 


Join the discussion...
Post Comment
Dfilbert  |  September 10, 2014 at 11:17 pm
Great article Phil !! I would enjoy seeing your comments regarding two other aspects of audio circuits - and their relative suitability for each design type: high Voltage and high current !!  It is my intuition that point to point wiring is better suited for all-tube amps because of their very high plate voltages and high currents.  With PCB - the traces are thin and sometimes very close together - perhaps introducing exposures to shorting and/or trace burnout ?? 
MikeTolo  |  September 10, 2014 at 11:17 pm
I wouldn't call vintage Fender amps "point to point." I use that term to refer to amps with all the components flying between connections--there is no circuit board of any kind. Those are a real pain to service while vintage Fenders are a dream.
BC Audio  |  September 10, 2014 at 11:16 pm
Phil, great, in-depth article, but you are misusing the term "point-to-point." What you call point-to-point is not. Eyelet and turret boards are two forms of board-based construction. Point-to-point it means no board at all. Please check out my article on the subject here: http://www.guitartonetalk.com/2012/12/13/whats-the-point-of-point-to-point/ With respect, Bruce Clement, BC Audio
LARRY L  |  September 10, 2014 at 11:16 pm
Hi phil, i had my fender deluxe reissue  gutted out keeping only the lamp light and jacks, then hand wired for the reason to have  better caps and resistors,  etc, and  replaceable pods. the tone, response, clarity, dynamic range, harmonics... was much better,  using the better components also using all mercury iron.the stock boards are also too small to fit the larger resistors and caps with the small cheap pods just soldered on the smaller board. they did not even put in silver mica caps for the highs,  about a dollar retail cost at radio shack.  that tell me a lot about fender. i did a lot of modding on 2 drri's i had owned only to give up still not achieving the vintage tone and sparkle of a real dr. i was told for years the pc board makes no difference only to find out it is the sum of the whole,,,,, all the components  need to be factored in.
Delmont  |  September 10, 2014 at 11:10 pm
Thanks for the article - a good pro-and-con piece. 
In my limited experience, I've found that while it's true that PCB amps are a lot cheaper, several that I've owned have required repairs that, according to the amp techs who fixed on them, would have been considerably cheaper in a point-to-point amp.
Economically speaking, the best amps for the buck I've owned have been very used point-to-point amps that I bought cheap and eventually had overhauled by good techs. The costs ended up in the same ballpark as buying a new PCB amp, and the repair bills post-rehab have been much lower.
That's just one guit-picker's experience, of course. Love to read what others have to say. Always learning.
More Cool Stuff
Here's a clever way for guitarists to tame the "crispiness" of audio interf...
  Our affordable 22500 Dual Stereo Looper is shipping to music stores now....
sign in
contact us
*Indicates required fields
Name *
Email Address *
Issue Type *
please wait